Birthright v. Audrey Trepiccione



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-B12-893A
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-00893-JAG
File Date: Thursday, December 20, 2012
Plaintiff: Birthright
Plaintiff Counsel: Edward J. Longosz II, Gabriella V. Cellarosi of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC
Defendant: Audrey Trepiccione
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Judge: District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
12/20/2012 3 Summons Issued as to Audrey Trepiccione and returned to counsel of record for service via first-class mail as directed in telephone call this date; (lsal) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
12/20/2012 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Birthright. (lsal) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
12/20/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Audrey Trepiccione (Filing fee $350.00, receipt number 34683019448) filed by Birthright (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt)(lsal) (Entered: 12/20/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate