Stern Stewart & Co. v. Eva.com
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-S12-1006E
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01006-LMB-JFA
File Date: Monday, September 10, 2012
Plaintiff: Stern Stewart & Co.
Plaintiff Counsel: Martin M. Zoltick of Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck
Defendant: Eva.com
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Judge: District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema
Referred To: Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
9/10/2012 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Stern Stewart & Co.. (klau, ) (Entered: 09/18/2012)
9/10/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Eva.com ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 14683031012.), filed by Stern Stewart & Co.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Letter, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet, # 9 Receipt)(klau, ) (Entered: 09/18/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate