Oncology Tech, Inc. v. .DECIMAL, INC. et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-O10-737D
Court Case Number: 5:10-cv-00737-FB
File Date: Friday, September 03, 2010
Plaintiff: Oncology Tech, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Mark H. Miller of Jackson Walker, L.L.P.
Defendant: .DECIMAL, INC.
.Decimal, Inc.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Texas Western District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Fred Biery
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
9/3/2010 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0542-3047477). No Summons requested at this time, filed by ONCOLOGY TECH, INC..(Miller, Mark) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
9/3/2010 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Primomo (kh2) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
9/3/2010 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kh2) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate