Coach, Inc. et al v. Cell Phone Repair Center et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-C11-548C
Court Case Number: 6:11-cv-00548-MHS
File Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Plaintiff: Coach, Inc.
Coach Services, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Natalie L. Arbaugh of Fish & Richardson PC
Defendant: Cell Phone Repair Center
Amishbhail Patel
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge Michael H. Schneider
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
10/18/2011 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Arbaugh, Natalie) (Entered: 10/18/2011)
10/18/2011 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Coach Services, Inc., Coach, Inc. (Arbaugh, Natalie) (Entered: 10/18/2011)
10/18/2011 1
10/18/2011 Judge Michael H. Schneider added. (mll, ) (Entered: 10/20/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate