H.C. Starck GmbH v. Admat Inc.
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-H12-3053A
Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-03053-CDJ
File Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012
Plaintiff: H.C. Starck GmbH
Plaintiff Counsel: David Newmann of Hogan Lovells US LLP
Defendant: Admat Inc.
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Judge: Honorable C. Darnell Jones II
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/31/2012 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) US 6,193,779 B1. (tj, ) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
5/31/2012 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by H.C. STARCK GMBH.(tj, ) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
5/31/2012 1 COMPLAINT against ADMAT INCORPORATED ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 063951.), filed by H.C. STARCK GMBH. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Form, # 2 Case Management Track Form)(tj, ) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
5/31/2012 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by H.C. STARCK GMBH. (tj, ) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
5/31/2012 Summons Issued as to ADMAT INCORPORATED. Forwarded To: Counsel on 6/1/12 (tj, ) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate