Maaco Franchising Inc. v. John Wendkos et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-M12-6194J
Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-06194-AB
File Date: Friday, November 2, 2012
Plaintiff: Maaco Franchising Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Constantine T. Fournaris of Wiggin & Dana LLP
Defendant: John Wendkos
Susan Wendkos
Stacy David Inc.
JB Brandon Inc.
Frank Delvecchio
Mary Beth McGucken
David Franklin
Janice Franklin
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
11/2/2012 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. (SEE DOCUMENT #1 FOR ATTACHMENT)(tj, ) (Entered: 11/02/2012)
11/2/2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 071762.), filed by MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.(tj, ) (Entered: 11/02/2012)
11/2/2012 Summons Issued as to FRANK DELVECCHIO, DAVID FRANKLIN, JANICE FRANKLIN, JB BRANDON, INC., MARY BETH MCGUCKEN, STACY DAVID, INC., JOHN WENDKOS, SUSAN WENDKOS. Given To: Counsel on 11/2/12 (tj, ) (Entered: 11/02/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate