Relo Franchise Services v. Paul Davis
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-R12-427P
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00427-SJD
File Date: Friday, June 01, 2012
Plaintiff: Relo Franchise Services
Plaintiff Counsel: Mary E. Gettins of Gettins & Nelson LLC
Defendant: Paul Davis
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/1/2012 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Relo Franchise Services. (Gettins, Mary) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
6/1/2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 paid - receipt number: 0648-3666652), filed by Relo Franchise Services. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A Trademark Registration, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B Franchise Agreement page 1-20, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B Franchise Agreement pages 20-40, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C Amendment to the Franhcise Agreement, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D Notice of Termination, # 6 Summons Form, # 7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gettins, Mary) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate