Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd. v.

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-U12-3599D
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-03599-RWS
File Date: Monday, May 07, 2012
Plaintiff: Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd.
Plaintiff Counsel: Bruce E. Colfin of Jacobson & Colfin PC
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Robert W. Sweet

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
5/7/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 7397)Document filed by Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd.(ama) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
5/7/2012 Mailed notice to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to report the filing of this action. (ama) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
5/7/2012 Case Designated ECF. (ama) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
5/7/2012 Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger is so designated. (ama) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
5/7/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (ama) (Entered: 05/09/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate