Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-L11-9436W
Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-09436-ALC-HBP
File Date: Thursday, December 22, 2011
Plaintiff: Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.
Plaintiff Counsel: Theodore Conrad Max of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP
Robert E. Shapiro, Vito S. Solitro, Wendi Elizabeth Sloane of Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP
Defendant: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr.
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
12/30/2011 4 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. (Signed by Judge Robert L. Carter on 12/30/2011) (js) (Entered: 12/30/2011)
12/22/2011 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
12/22/2011 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton for Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. Document filed by Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.(ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
12/22/2011 1
12/22/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
12/22/2011 Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
12/22/2011 Case Designated ECF. (ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
12/22/2011 Mailed notice to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to report the filing of this action. (ama) (Entered: 12/23/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate