Sin City Motorsports, Inc. v.



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-S12-1078K
Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-01078-GMN -RJJ
File Date: Friday, June 22, 2012
Plaintiff: Sin City Motorsports, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: James D. Boyle, Kimberly J Cooper of Cotton, Driggs, Walch, Holley, Woloson & Thompson
Defendant: Kohl's Corporation
Kohl's Illinois, Inc.
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement
Court: Nevada District Court
Judge: Judge Gloria M. Navarro
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/25/2012 4 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint) (MMM) (Entered: 06/25/2012)
6/25/2012 3
6/25/2012 2
6/22/2012 1
6/22/2012 Case assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. (MMM) (Entered: 06/25/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate