Talus Outdoor Technologies, LLC v. Implus Footcare, LLC
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-T12-96I
Court Case Number: 9:12-cv-00096-DLC-JCL
File Date: Thursday, June 07, 2012
Plaintiff: Talus Outdoor Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Katherine E. Sullivan of Katherine E. Sullivan, PLLC
Defendant: Implus Footcare, LLC
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Montana District Court
Judge: Judge Dana L. Christensen
Referred To: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/7/2012 2 Electronic Mailing of Consent: Judge Lynch as Presiding Judge. Mailed to counsel Katherine E. Sullivan. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 7/12/2012. (NOS, ) (Entered: 06/07/2012)
6/7/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Implus Footcare, LLC, filed by Talus Outdoor Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibits A-C_federal trademark registration certificate and application) (NOS, ) (Entered: 06/07/2012)
6/7/2012 Filing fee paid (in shell case): $350.00, receipt number 0977-1075786. (NOS, ) (Entered: 06/07/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate