Cotton Babies, Inc. v. Ecobumz Earth Friendly Diaper Solutions, Ltd.



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-C11-1005E
Court Case Number: 4:11-cv-01005-FRB
File Date: Thursday, June 02, 2011
Plaintiff: Cotton Babies, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Matthew L. Cutler of Harness Dickey & Pierce PLC
Defendant: Ecobumz Earth Friendly Diaper Solutions, Ltd.
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/3/2011 3 REPORT to Commissioner of the filing of an action. (DLT) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
6/3/2011 Case Opening Notification, Consents to Magistrate to be filed by all parties., Disclosure of Corporate Interest to be filed by all corporations.. Judge Assigned: Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles. (DLT) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
6/2/2011 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATION INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Cotton Babies, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Cutler, Matthew) (Entered: 06/02/2011)
6/2/2011 1
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate