Lifetouch, Inc. v. American Photo Marketing, Inc. et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-L12-1433A
Court Case Number: 0:12-cv-01433-DWF-JSM
File Date: Friday, June 15, 2012
Plaintiff: Lifetouch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Scott W. Johnston, Danielle I. Mattessich of Merchant & Gould PC
Defendant: American Photo Marketing, Inc.
Stewart Cerier
Cause: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement
Court: Minnesota District Court
Judge: Judge Donovan W. Frank
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/15/2012 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. The Lifetouch Inc. is a corporate parent of Plaintiff Lifetouch, Inc. (jam) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
6/15/2012 1 COMPLAINT against American Photo Marketing, Inc., Stewart Cerier ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 65707), filed by Lifetouch, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Master List, referred to Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1 - 4, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
6/15/2012 Summons Issued as to American Photo Marketing, Inc., Stewart Cerier. (jam) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate