Questar Gas Company v. Thermal-Wise Insulation, LLC

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-Q12-837T
Court Case Number: 0:12-cv-00837-MJD-JJK
File Date: Tuesday, April 03, 2012
Plaintiff: Questar Gas Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Lawrence M. Shapiro, Jenny Gassman-Pines of Greene Espel PLLP
Defendant: Thermal-Wise Insulation, LLC
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Minnesota District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Michael J. Davis
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
4/3/2012 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Tracey Harrach by Questar Gas Company. (RLR) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
4/3/2012 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Questar Corporation is a corporate parent of Plaintiff Questar Gas Company. (RLR) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
4/3/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Thermal-Wise Insulation, LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 4063773.) assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Master list and referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, filed by Questar Gas Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLR) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
4/3/2012 Summons Issued as to Thermal-Wise Insulation, LLC. (RLR) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate