Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v.



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-N12-276P
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00276-CCB
File Date: Friday, January 27, 2012
Plaintiff: Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Jason C Brino, Joshua Aaron Glikin of Bowie and Jensen LLC
Defendant: Pet Meds N' More, Inc.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Maryland District Court
Judge: Judge Catherine C. Blake
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/27/2012 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.. (Glikin, Joshua) (Entered: 01/27/2012)
1/27/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Pet Meds N' More, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0416-3342169.), filed by Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Index of Exhibits to Complaint, # 4 Exhibit A, # 5 Exhibit B, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Exhibit K, # 15 Exhibit L, # 16 Exhibit M)(Glikin, Joshua) (Entered: 01/27/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2012 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate