Intel Corporation v.

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-I12-137I
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-00137-BAJ-SCR
File Date: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Plaintiff: Intel Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: A. Justin Ourso, III of Jones, Walker
Defendant: Intel @ Home, LLC
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
3/7/2012 3 Summons Issued as to Intel @ Home, LLC. (NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve both the summons and all attachments in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.) (LSM) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
3/7/2012 2 NOTICE of Trademark AO 120 Form by Intel Corporation (LSM) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
3/7/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Intel @ Home, LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 053N-791961.), filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Exhibit BB, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Summons in a Civil Action- Kogel, # 4 Summons in a Civil Action- Bezou)(Ourso, A.) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate