Robert Namer et al v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-RO12-14B
Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00014-ILRL-ALC
File Date: Wednesday, January 04, 2012
Plaintiff: Robert Namer
Voice of America
Plaintiff Counsel: Robert G. Harvey , Sr. of Law Offices of Robert G. Harvey, Sr., PLC
Defendant: Broadcasting Board of Governors
Cause: 09:0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Alma L. Chasez
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/4/2012 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Alma L. Chasez. (jmd, ) (Entered: 01/04/2012)
1/4/2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 053L-3333603) filed by Robert Namer, Voice of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 Summons)(Harvey, Robert) (Entered: 01/04/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2012 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate