Arkansas County Seed Co Inc v. Karl L Williams et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-A10-1231K
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-01231-JBM -JAG
File Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010
Plaintiff: Arkansas County Seed Co Inc
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen C Parker of Parker Law Firm PLLC
Defendant: Karl L Williams
John Does 1-50
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Judge: Judge Joe Billy McDade
Referred To: Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/22/2010 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent by Arkansas County Seed Co Inc. (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 07/22/2010)
7/22/2010 2 Summons Issued as to Karl L Williams, personally d/b/a Muddy Creek Whitetail. (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 07/22/2010)
7/22/2010 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-50, Karl L Williams (Filing fee $ 350.00 Receipt 14626008267), filed by Arkansas County Seed Co Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RK, ilcd) (Entered: 07/22/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate