Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd. v. HS Motos, Inc. et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-J08-99H
Court Case Number: 4:08-cv-00099-CDL
File Date: Friday, July 11, 2008
Plaintiff: Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd.
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel J. Warren, Deborah K. Butler of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan
Defendant: HS Motos, Inc.
Qlink Motor
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Judge: Clay D. Land
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/14/2008 3 Summons Issued as to Qlink Motor on 7/14/2008. (esl) (Entered: 07/14/2008)
7/14/2008 2 Summons Issued as to HS Motos, Inc on 7/14/2008. (esl) (Entered: 07/14/2008)
7/11/2008 1 COMPLAINT against HS Motos, Inc, and Qlink Motor Filing Fee $ 350, Receipt Number 605164,filed by Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd.. Service of Complaint due by 11/12/2008. Status Review deadline is 7/14/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F)(esl) (Entered: 07/14/2008)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate