Chevron Intellectual Property LLC et al v. Salama Investments, Inc.
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-C10-679S
Court Case Number: 6:10-cv-00679-JA-DAB
File Date: Friday, April 30, 2010
Plaintiff: Chevron Intellectual Property LLC
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Richard Oliver of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
Defendant: Salama Investments, Inc.
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Judge: Judge John Antoon II
Referred To: Magistrate Judge David A. Baker
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/3/2010 2 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachment: # 1 Complaint) (LAM) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
5/3/2010 Summons issued as to Salama Investments, Inc. (LAM) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
4/30/2010 1 COMPLAINT against Salama Investments, Inc. (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 34628), filed by Chevron Intellectual Property LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (Attachment: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAM) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate