Wendell Hicken v. Migrant Studios, LLC
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-W12-1793M
Court Case Number: 8:12-cv-01793-EAK-TBM
File Date: Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Plaintiff: Wendell Hicken
Plaintiff Counsel: Jeremy E. Gluckman of Jeremy E. Gluckman PA
Defendant: Migrant Studios, LLC
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Judge: Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun III
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
8/9/2012 4 Copyright Report sent to Washington. (JMS) (Entered: 08/10/2012)
8/8/2012 3 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 8/8/2012. (JMS) (Entered: 08/09/2012)
8/8/2012 2 Summons issued as to Migrant Studios, LLC. (JMS) (Entered: 08/09/2012)
8/8/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Migrant Studios, LLC (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number TPA-12628) filed by Wendell Hicken. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JMS) (Entered: 08/09/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate