Xerox Corporation v. John Does 1-10



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-X11-590J
Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-00590-RNC
File Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011
Plaintiff: Xerox Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian C. Roche, Gerald C. Pia Jr. of Roche Pia LLC
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Connecticut District Court
Judge: Judge Robert N. Chatigny
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
4/15/2011
4/14/2011 5 MOTION for Permission to Conduct Immediate Discovery Order by Xerox Corporation. (Pia, Gerald) (Entered: 04/14/2011)
4/14/2011 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian C. Roche on behalf of Xerox Corporation (Roche, Brian) (Entered: 04/14/2011)
4/14/2011 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Xerox Corporation. (Pia, Gerald) (Entered: 04/14/2011)
4/14/2011 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerald C. Pia, Jr on behalf of Xerox Corporation (Pia, Gerald) (Entered: 04/14/2011)
4/14/2011 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-10, filed by Xerox Corporation.(Pia, Gerald) (Entered: 04/14/2011)
4/14/2011 Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 04/19/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate