American Automobile Association v. William C. Clayton, Jr.
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-A09-1457W
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-01457-REB
File Date: Friday, June 19, 2009
Plaintiff: American Automobile Association
Plaintiff Counsel: Elizabeth Harris Getches of Moye White, LLP
Defendant: William C. Clayton, Jr.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Colorado District Court
Judge: Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/22/2009 3 REPORT on the filing of an action mailed to Commissioner of Trademarks (jak, ) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
6/22/2009 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff American Automobile Association. (jak, ) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
6/22/2009 1 COMPLAINT against William C. Clayton, Jr ( Filing fee $ 350, Receipt Number 19860) Summons Issued, filed by American Automobile Association. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt)(jak, ) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate