Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Nathan Esplanade

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-R13-396N
Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00396-MMA-BLM
File Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Plaintiff: Renovation Realty, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Sean Flaherty of Coast Law Group LLP
Defendant: Nathan Esplanade
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: California Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Michael M. Anello
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
2/19/2013 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dlg) (Entered: 02/19/2013)
2/19/2013 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *4222923*, *4240597* cc:USPTO (dlg) (Entered: 02/19/2013)
2/19/2013 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Nathan Esplanade ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0974-5633476.), filed by Renovation Realty, Inc.The new case number is 3:13-cv-396-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Flaherty, Sean)(dlg) (Entered: 02/19/2013)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate