Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited v. Telebrands Corp.
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-M11-3153T
Court Case Number: 2:11-cv-03153-LKK-DAD
File Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Plaintiff: Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited
Plaintiff Counsel: Matthew Paul Vafidis of Holland & Knight LLP
Defendant: Telebrands Corp.
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: California Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge Lawrence K. Karlton
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
11/29/2011 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment on non-infringement and cancellation against All Defendants by Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-D to Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Vafidis, Matthew) Modified on 11/29/2011 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: 11/29/2011)
11/29/2011 RECEIPT number #CAE200040361 $350.00 fbo Meyer Manufacturing Company by Matthew Paul Vafidis on 11/29/2011. (Mena-Sanchez, L) (Entered: 11/29/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate