Moroccanoil, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-M10-2043C
Court Case Number: 2:10-cv-02043-SJO-PLA
File Date: Monday, March 22, 2010
Plaintiff: Moroccanoil, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Mark Riedel, William Christian Conkle of Conkle Kremer and Engel PLC
Defendant: CVS Caremark Corporation
Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement
Court: California Central District Court
Judge: Judge S. James Otero
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/16/2011 34 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: granting 33 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Martin I Saperstein on behalf of Defendant E&M ESR, Inc., designating Dennis G. Martin as local counsel. (lt) (Entered: 06/16/2011)
6/15/2011 33 APPLICATION for attorney Martin Ira Saperstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8803532 paid.) filed by defendant E & M ESR Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 G-64 Order)(Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 06/15/2011)
5/31/2011 32 ORDER EXTENDING NONEXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE FOR PURPOSES OF RESOLVING DISPUTES THAT MAY ARISE CONCERNING THE DEPOSITIONS OF CVS AND E&M by Judge Dolly M. Gee 31 . The Non-Expert Discovery Cut-off, which includes the last day to hear related discovery motions, shall be extended from July 22, 2011 to September 13, 2011, only with respect to any disputes that may arise concerning the 30(b)(6) depositions of CVS & E&M. (im) (Entered: 06/02/2011)
5/27/2011 31 STIPULATION to Continue NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF from 7/22/2011 to 9/13/2011 filed by PLAINTIFF Moroccanoil, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order EXTENDING NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF)(Medrano, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/27/2011)
12/16/2010 30 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Dennis G Martin counsel for Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc., E & M ESR Inc.Daniel J. Russell is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by counsel for Defendant (Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 12/16/2010)
12/16/2010 29 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Dennis G Martin counsel for Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc., E & M ESR Inc.Samuel L. Alberstadt is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by counsel for Defendant (Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 12/16/2010)
9/30/2010 28 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Jury Trial (Estimate 7 days) set for 11/8/2011 at 08:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/11/2011 at 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Amended pleadings and Addition of Parties Cut-Off 1/7/2011. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 7/22/2011. Motions Cut-Off (filing deadline) due by 8/16/2011. Expert Disclosure & Report Deadline 8/9/2011. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure & Report Deadline 8/30/2011. Expert Discovery Cut-Off 9/13/2011. Settlement Conference Completion Date 9/6/2010. Motions in Limine to be filed by 9/13/2011. Opposition to Motions in Limine Filing Deadline 9/20/2011. Status Report re Settlement due by 9/20/2011. Proposed Pretrial Conference Order due by 9/20/2011. Contentions of Fact/Law 9/20/2011. Pretrial Exhibit Stipulation 9/20/2011. Joint Exhibit List due by 9/20/2011. Witness Lists & Joint Trial Witness Time Estimate Form due by 9/202011. Proposed Voir Dire Questions & Agreed-to Statement of Case 9/20/2011. Joint Statement of Jury Instructions & Joint Statement of Disputed Instructions 9/20/2011. Verdict Forms 9/20/2011. (jp) (Entered: 10/01/2010)
9/23/2010 27 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc... (Riedel, Mark) (Entered: 09/23/2010)
9/22/2010 26 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc... (Riedel, Mark) (Entered: 09/22/2010)
7/30/2010 25 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Scheduling Conference set for 10/6/2010 at 11:00 AM. (pp) (Entered: 08/02/2010)
7/2/2010 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: E & M ESR, Inc.'s Answer to Second Amended Complaint filed 7/1/2010 22 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 07/06/2010)
7/2/2010 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: CVS' Answer to Second Amended Complaint filed 7/1/2010 21 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 07/06/2010)
7/1/2010 22 ANSWER to Amended Complaint 20 filed by Defendant E & M ESR Inc.(Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
7/1/2010 21 ANSWER to Amended Complaint 20 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc..(Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
6/16/2010 20 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc., E & M ESR Inc, and DOES; amending First Amended Complaint 12 . Demand for Jury Trial. Filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil. Inc. (mg) (gk). (Entered: 06/18/2010)
6/16/2010 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to File Second Amended Complaint filed 6/16/2010 16 . The following error(s) was found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 06/16/2010)
6/16/2010 16 STIPULATION to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc..(Riedel, Mark) (Entered: 06/16/2010)
6/15/2010 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCLOSURES by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Protective Order 15 . SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. (mp) (Entered: 06/16/2010)
6/15/2010 17 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: Stipulation for Protective Order 15 . Counsel are advised that a protective order governs only discovery. A Protective order does not govern trial and may not require trial witnesses to be bound by the protective order. Protected Material used at trial shall become public absent a separate court order upon written motion and sufficient cause shown. A protective order shall be separately issued by the court. Please note the changes made by the court. (mp) (Entered: 06/16/2010)
6/14/2010 15 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Conkle, William) (Entered: 06/14/2010)
6/10/2010 14 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to New York Value Club Ltd. (Riedel, Mark) (Entered: 06/10/2010)
6/2/2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint, 12 as to defendants CVS Caremark Corporation, Does, E & M ESR Inc, New York Value Club Ltd. (lc) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
5/28/2010 11 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee, ORDERING First Amended Complaint; Certification and Notice of Interested Parties submitted by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc. received on 5/27/2010 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (jp) (Entered: 06/01/2010)
5/27/2010 13 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Moroccanoil. Inc., (jp) (Entered: 06/01/2010)
5/27/2010 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation, E & M ESR Inc, New York Value Club Ltd amending Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc. (jp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2010: # 1 issued summons) (lc). (Entered: 06/01/2010)
5/7/2010 10 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc.. Order Re Transfer Pursuant to General Order 08-05 (Related Cases) and Initial Standing Order for Cases Assigned to Judge Gee (Conkle, William) (Entered: 05/07/2010)
5/5/2010 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. Refer to document for details of the Order. (pso) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
5/5/2010 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 10-00563 DMG(AGRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and Judge S. James Otero to Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 10-02043 DMG(AGRx).Signed by Judge Dolly M. Gee (rn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
4/27/2010 7 FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CVS Caremark Corporation answer now due 5/19/2010, filed by Defendant CVS Caremark Corporation.(Martin, Dennis) (Entered: 04/27/2010)
4/22/2010 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc., upon Defendant CVS Caremark Corporation served on 4/7/2010, answer due 4/28/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Amanda Clarke, Legal Assistant, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(Conkle, William) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
3/31/2010 5 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO by Judge S. James Otero. Read This Order Carefully. It Controls This Case and Differs in Some Respects From the Local Rules. (See Order for Details). (sch) (Entered: 03/31/2010)
3/22/2010 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(ghap) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
3/22/2010 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Moroccanoil, Inc.(ghap) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
3/22/2010 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc. (ghap) (ds). (Entered: 03/23/2010)
3/22/2010 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation, Does 1 through 10 Inclusive. Case assigned to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.(Filing fee $ 350: PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Moroccanoil, Inc..(ghap) (ds). (Entered: 03/23/2010)
3/22/2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation, Does 1 through 10 Inclusive. (ghap) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Krongold Law Corp., P.C. Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate