United States Olympic Committee v. Asics America Corporation et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-U08-522A
Court Case Number: 8:08-cv-00522-AG-AN
File Date: Friday, May 09, 2008
Plaintiff: United States Olympic Committee
Plaintiff Counsel: Douglas A. Winthrop of Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin
Defendant: Asics America Corporation
Does 1-10
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Court: California Central District Court
Judge: Judge Andrew J. Guilford
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato
Notes: Date terminated: 02/27/2009
Date of last filing: 02/27/2009

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/9/2008 2 Disclosure and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff United States Olympic Committee. (twdb) (Entered: 05/12/2008)
5/9/2008 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Asics America Corporation, DOES 1 through 10.(Filing fee $ 350 paid), filed by plaintiff United States Olympic Committee.(twdb) (Entered: 05/12/2008)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Krongold Law Corp., P.C. Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate