Hao Chen v. Jagex Limited
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: T-H11-1802J
Court Case Number: 2:11-cv-01802-JAT
File Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Plaintiff: Hao Chen
Plaintiff Counsel: Michael Frank Campillo of Venable Campillo Logan & Meaney PC
Defendant: Jagex Limited
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Arizona District Court
Judge: Judge James A Teilborg
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
9/14/2011 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX 0970-5815902. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A. Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 11-01802-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) (Entered: 09/14/2011)
9/14/2011 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-5815902, filed by Hao Chen (submitted by Michael Campillo). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) (Entered: 09/14/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate