Galaxy Gaming, Inc. v. Unax Service LLC et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Docket Text Information

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.


Date # Docket Text
3/15/2012 7 Summons electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Xuming Shangguan, Unax Service LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(RE) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
3/15/2012 4 ORDER re 2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Michael D. Rounds for Galaxy Gaming, Inc., by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
3/15/2012 Judge James L. Robart added. (RE) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
3/14/2012 6
3/14/2012 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an Patent action. E-mailed to the US Patent Office. (RE) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
3/14/2012 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT for Galaxy Gaming, Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. (RE) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
3/14/2012 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Michael D. Rounds FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Galaxy Gaming, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2745727. (Foster, Stacie) (Entered: 03/14/2012)
3/14/2012 1 COMPLAINT for patent infringement against defendant(s) All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-2745656), filed by Galaxy Gaming, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet, # 9 Summons Unax, # 10 Summons Shangguan, # 11 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form120), # 12 Exhibit corporate disclosure statement)(Foster, Stacie) (Entered: 03/14/2012)


Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate