Charles Robinson v. Kyle Bartlow et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: P-C12-24K
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-00024-NKM
File Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Plaintiff: Charles Robinson
Plaintiff Counsel: Dale R. Jensen of Zobrist Law Group
Defendant: Kyle Bartlow
Mariah Gentry
Joeybra LLC
Does 1-5, Inclusive
Cause: 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Court: Virginia Western District Court
Judge: Judge Norman K. Moon
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/23/2012 2 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by the Clerk. (mab)
5/22/2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 350; Receipt #0423-1545366), filed by Charles Robinson. 100 Day Notice due by 8/30/2012 120 Day Service due by 9/19/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(mab) (Entered: 05/23/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate