Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: P-M12-5S
Court Case Number: 4:12-cv-00005-RAS
File Date: Friday, January 06, 2012
Plaintiff: Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Andrew W. Spangler of Spangler Law PC
James C. Otteson, Philip Marsh, Michael Nguyen of Agility IP Law LLP
Michael North of North Weber & Baugh LLP
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge Richard A. Schell
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/6/2012 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
1/6/2012 1
1/6/2012 Case Assinged to Judge Richard A. Schell. Associated Cases: 4:12-cv-00007, 4:12-cv-00005-RAS-DDB(cm, ) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate