Andrew Katrinecz et al v. Jo-Dan International, Inc. dba JDI Technologies
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: P-A08-380J
Court Case Number: 2:08-cv-00380
File Date: Monday, October 06, 2008
Plaintiff: Andrew Katrinecz
David Byrd
Plaintiff Counsel: Michael C. Smith of Siebman Reynolds Burg Phillips & Smith LLP
David E. Dunham, Steven D. Urban of Taylor Dunham & Burgess LLP
Defendant: Jo-Dan International, Inc. dba JDI Technologies
Cause: 15:1126 Patent Infringement
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Judge: Judge T. John Ward
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
10/6/2008 1 COMPLAINT against Jo-Dan International, Inc. d/b/a JDI Technologies ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 05400000000001718591.), filed by Andrew Katrinecz, David Byrd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Michael) (Entered: 10/06/2008)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate