Okanagan Plant Improvement Corporation et al v. Hugo Oswald



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-O12-1407H
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-01407
File Date: Monday, August 06, 2012
Plaintiff: Okanagan Plant Improvement Corporation
Stemilt Growers, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Brett Langdon Gibbs of Prenda Law Inc.
Jay R. Smith-Hill, Brenna Kristine Legaard of Lane Powell PC
Defendant: Hugo Oswald
Cause: 15:1126 Patent Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge:
Unassigned
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
8/6/2012 1 Complaint. for Patent Infringement Filing fee in the amount of $350 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-2987976 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Okanagan Plant Improvement Corporation, Stemilt Growers, LLC against Hugo Oswald (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Summons). (Smith-Hill, Jay) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate