Mag-Nif, Inc. v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Docket Text Information

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.


Date # Docket Text
6/13/2012 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, no summons issued. (C,BA) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/13/2012 Notice by Clerk that Mag-Nif, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (C,BA) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/13/2012 This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to Local Patent Rules. (C,BA) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/13/2012 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (C,BA) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/13/2012 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge McHargh. (C,BA) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/12/2012 2
6/12/2012 1


Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate