|
|
|
| RFC Case Number: |
P-C12-4422A |
| Court Case Number: |
1:12-cv-04422-SAS |
| File Date: |
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 |
| Plaintiff: |
Content Extraction and Transmission LLC
|
| Plaintiff Counsel: |
Jean-Marc Zimmerman of Zimmerman & Levi LLP
|
| Defendant: |
Artsyl Technologies, Inc.
|
| Cause: |
35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Court: |
New York Southern District Court |
| Judge: |
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
|
| Notes: |
|
| Patent Details: |
|
|
Docket Text
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Date |
# |
Docket Text |
| 6/7/2012 |
3 |
STANDING ORDER IN RE IMPLEMENTATION OF PATENT PILOT PROGRAM IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 21, 2011). It appearing that the Court has elected to participate in the Pilot Project for Patent Cases established pursuant to Pub L. No. 111-349, 124 Stat. 3674. Therefore, effective November 21, 2011, the Court's participation in the Patent Pilot Project will commence and shall include pro se cases. The Pilot program will be subject to the following procedures: When a designated Pilot judge receives a patent case on initial assignment, no transfer will take place. The designated Pilot judge will notify, by memorandum, the Assignment Committee of the assignment with a copy to the Case Assignment Unit.... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (sjo) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/7/2012 |
|
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney Jean-Marc Zimmerman for noncompliance with Section 14.3 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document 1 Complaint to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
2 |
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
1 |
COMPLAINT against Artsyl Technologies, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 1040172)Document filed by Content Extraction and Transmission LLC.(mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
|
Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
|
Mailed notice to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to report the filing of this action. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
|
Case Designated ECF. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
|
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
| 6/5/2012 |
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Artsyl Technologies, Inc. (mro) (Entered: 06/07/2012) |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Need more info about this lawsuit?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
IP Lawfirms & Attorneys
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP |
Info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cart 
