The Natural Baby Company v. Cotton Babies



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-T12-130C
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00130-RFC
File Date: Monday, October 01, 2012
Plaintiff: The Natural Baby Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Antoinette M. Tease Attorney at Law
Defendant: Cotton Babies
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Court: Montana District Court
Judge: Judge Richard F. Cebull
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
10/1/2012 1 COMPLAINT - CASE NUMBER IS CV-12-130-BLG-RFC against Cotton Babies filed by The Natural Baby Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G) (ACL, ) (Entered: 10/01/2012)
10/1/2012 Filing fee PAID IN THE SHELL CASE: $ 350, receipt number 0977-1132435 (ACL, ) (Entered: 10/01/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate