BreathableBaby, LLC v. Crown Crafts, Inc. et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: P-B12-94C
Court Case Number: 0:12-cv-00094-PJS-TNL
File Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Plaintiff: BreathableBaby, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Erik G. Swenson of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
Defendant: Crown Crafts, Inc.
Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc.
Cause: 15:1126 Patent Infringement
Court: Minnesota District Court
Judge: Judge Patrick J. Schiltz
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/11/2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 40061452.) assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Patent List and referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung, filed by BreathableBaby, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (kt) (Entered: 01/12/2012)
1/11/2012 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (kt) (Entered: 01/12/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate