MacGregor Golf Company v. Sonartec Inc. et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-M02-5S
Court Case Number: 1:02-cv-00005-WLS
File Date: Friday, January 18, 2002
Plaintiff: MacGregor Golf Company
Plaintiff Counsel:
Defendant: Sonartec Inc.
Royal Collection Inc.
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Judge: Judge W. Louis Sands
Notes: Date Terminated: 04/05/2002
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
4/5/2002 11 Notice of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL with prejudice by MacGregor Golf Co. [EOD Date 4/5/02] Order 1012516, Vol 46 (bjl) Modified on 04/05/2002 (Entered: 04/05/2002)
4/5/2002 Case Closed (bjl) (Entered: 04/05/2002)
4/4/2002 10 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Donald W. Lee as attorney for by MacGregor Golf Co. and terminating attorney William E. Cannon. (bjl) (Entered: 04/04/2002)
3/6/2002 9 ORDER granting [8-1] stipulation that defendant Sonartec may have until 3/8/02 to answer complaint. reset Answer deadline to 3/8/02 for Sonartec, Inc. ( signed by Judge W. L. Sands ) [EOD Date 3/6/02] (bjl) (Entered: 03/06/2002)
3/4/2002 8 STIPULATION Re: to Extend Time for Responding to Complaint until 3/8/02 by plaintiff MacGregor Golf Co., defendant Sonartec, Inc. (bjl) (Entered: 03/05/2002)
2/25/2002 7 ORDER granting [6-1] stipulation to extend time to answer until 3/4/02. reset Answer deadline to 3/4/02 for Sonartec, Inc. ( signed by Judge W. L. Sands ) [EOD Date 2/25/02] (bjl) (Entered: 02/25/2002)
2/21/2002 6 STIPULATION Re: Extending Time to Answer by plaintiff MacGregor Golf Co., defendant Sonartec, Inc. until 3/4/02. (bjl) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
2/12/2002 5 ORDER granting [4-1] joint motion to Extend Time for defendant Sonartec, Inc. to respond to plaintiff's complaint Reset Answer deadline to 2/25/02 for Sonartec, Inc. (signed by Judge W. L. Sands ) [EOD Date 2/12/02] (kme) (Entered: 02/12/2002)
2/11/2002 4 JOINT MOTION by MacGregor Golf Co., Sonartec, Inc., Royal Collection Inc to Extend Time for defendant Sonartec, Inc. to respond to plaintiff's complaint (kme) (Entered: 02/11/2002)
2/11/2002 MOTION(S) submitted: submitted [4-1] joint motion to Extend Time for defendant Sonartec, Inc. to respond to plaintiff's complaint ; Original case file and motion sent to Judge W. Louis Sands (kme) (Entered: 02/11/2002)
1/28/2002 3 RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to Sonartec, Inc. on 1/21/02. Answer due on 2/11/02 for Sonartec, Inc. (bjl) (Entered: 01/29/2002)
1/22/2002 Case referred to ARBITRATION (trh) (Entered: 01/22/2002)
1/18/2002 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MacGregor Golf Co. (kme) (Entered: 01/18/2002)
1/18/2002 1 COMPLAINT filed; FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 101338 Service of Complaint due by 5/20/02 for Royal Collection Inc, for Sonartec, Inc. (kme) (Entered: 01/18/2002)
1/18/2002 SUMMONS(ES) issued for Sonartec, Inc. (kme) (Entered: 01/18/2002)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate