Heeling Sports Limited v. Filo Corporation et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-H08-22248F
Court Case Number: 1:08-cv-22248-CMA
File Date: Monday, August 11, 2008
Plaintiff: Heeling Sports Limited
Plaintiff Counsel: Kenneth R. Hartmann, Michael S. Schwager of Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton
Robert J. Ward of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
Defendant: Filo Corporation
Diego Lobato
Cause: 35:0145 Patent Infringement
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Judge: Cecilia M. Altonaga
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
8/12/2008 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (lh) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
8/11/2008 2 Summons Issued as to Filo Corporation, Diego Lobato. (lh) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
8/11/2008 1 COMPLAINT against Filo Corporation, Diego Lobato; Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 985203, filed by Heeling Sports Limited.(lh) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate