Robert Lee Manning, Jr. v. NASA et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-R13-571N
Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-00571-UA-DUTY
File Date: Friday, January 25, 2013
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Plaintiff Counsel: Robert Lee Manning, Jr. PRO SE
Defendant: NASA
United States
David J Kappos
Congresswoman Maxine Waters
National Rifle Association
Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause: 28:1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Court: California Central District Court
Judge: Judge Unassigned
Referred To: Duty Magistrate Judge
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
1/25/2013 1 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Lodged Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet)(ghap) (Entered: 01/31/2013)
1/25/2013 LODGED COMPLAINT forwarded to DUTY Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Complaint sought to be filed by Plaintiff Robert Lee Manning, Jr. (ghap) (Entered: 01/31/2013)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate