Health Market Science Inc. v. HomecareCRM LLC



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-H11-3299H
Court Case Number: 2:11-cv-03299-RK
File Date: Thursday, May 19, 2011
Plaintiff: Health Market Science Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Camille M. Miller of Cozen O'Connor PC
Defendant: HomecareCRM LLC
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Judge: Honorable Robert F. Kelly
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/19/2011 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by HEALTH MARKET SCIENCE, INC..(ks, ) (Entered: 05/20/2011)
5/19/2011 1 COMPLAINT against HOMECARECRM, LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 043499.), filed by HEALTH MARKET SCIENCE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Case Management Track Form, # 3 Designation Form)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/20/2011)
5/19/2011 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by HEALTH MARKET SCIENCE, INC.. (ks, ) (Entered: 05/20/2011)
5/19/2011 Summons Issued as to HOMECARECRM, LLC. GIVEN To: Counsel on 5/19/11 (ks, ) . (Entered: 05/20/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate