Jing-Sheng Yang v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc. et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-J13-676K
Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-00676-MHW-EPD
File Date: Friday, July 12, 2013
Plaintiff: Jing-Sheng Yang
Plaintiff Counsel: Perry M. Chappano of Chappano Wood PLL
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Leader Light Ltd.
Does 1-100
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Michael H. Watson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
7/12/2013 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-4177988), filed by Jing-Sheng Yang. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Plaintiff Yang's Complaint Yang v. Kohl's et. al, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Plaintiff Yang's Complaint Yang v. Kohl's et. al, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C to Plaintiff Yang's Complaint Yang v. Kohl's et. al, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet to Plaintiff Yang's Complaint Yang v. Kohl's et. al, # 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright Yang v. Kohl's et. al) (Chappano, Perry) (Entered: 07/12/2013)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate