Arthur Strozewksi v. Sherwin Jewelry
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-A12-2270S
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-02270-LW
File Date: Thursday, September 06, 2012
Plaintiff: Arthur Strozewksi
Plaintiff Counsel: C. Vincent Choken, David A. Welling of Choken & Welling
John D. Gugliotta of Patent Copyright & Trademark Law Group
Defendant: Sherwin Jewelry
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Judge: Judge Lesley Wells
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
9/7/2012 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Sherwin Jewelry. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Consent Form) (C,BA) (Entered: 09/07/2012)
9/7/2012 Judge Lesley Wells assigned to case. (C,BA) (Entered: 09/07/2012)
9/7/2012 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli. (C,BA) (Entered: 09/07/2012)
9/6/2012 1
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate