Andrea Carter-Bowman v. Abrams Media Network
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-A12-4989A
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-04989-PKC
File Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Plaintiff: Andrea Carter-Bowman
Plaintiff Counsel: Zachary W. Silverman of Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
Defendant: Abrams Media Network
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge P. Kevin Castel
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/26/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Abrams Media Network. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 1041988)Document filed by Andrea Carter-Bowman.(mro) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
6/26/2012 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (mro) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
6/26/2012 Case Designated ECF. (mro) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
6/26/2012 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. (mro) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
6/26/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Abrams Media Network. (mro) (Entered: 06/29/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate