Tanya Steele v. Richard Bell et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-T11-9343R
Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-09343-PKC
File Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Plaintiff: Tanya Steele
Plaintiff Counsel: Kerry A. Brennan of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Defendant: Richard Bell
Josh Milani Gallery Pty. Ltd.
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge P. Kevin Castel

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
12/20/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Richard Bell, Josh Milani Gallery Pty. Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401025018)Document filed by Tanya Steele.(rdz) (Entered: 12/22/2011)
12/20/2011 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (rdz) (Entered: 12/22/2011)
12/20/2011 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) (Entered: 12/22/2011)
12/20/2011 Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis is so designated. (rdz) (Entered: 12/22/2011)
12/20/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Richard Bell, Josh Milani Gallery Pty. Ltd.. (rdz) (Entered: 12/22/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate