Nicholas Jarecki v. Michael Ohoven et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-N11-2002M
Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-02002-GBD
File Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Plaintiff: Nicholas Jarecki
Plaintiff Counsel: Gary J. Mennitt, Laura E. Meehan of Dechert LLP
Defendant: Michael Ohoven
Infinity Media, Inc.
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge George B. Daniels
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
3/24/2011 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (mbe) (Entered: 03/24/2011)
3/23/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Infinity Media, Inc., Michael Ohoven. (mbe) (Entered: 03/24/2011)
3/22/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Infinity Media, Inc., Michael Ohoven. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 932950)Document filed by Nicholas Jarecki.(mbe) (Entered: 03/24/2011)
3/22/2011 Case Designated ECF. (mbe) (Entered: 03/24/2011)
3/22/2011 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. (mbe) (Entered: 03/24/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate