Kevin Harper v. Iconfactory, Inc.
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-K11-267I
Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-00267-VM
File Date: Thursday, January 13, 2011
Plaintiff: Kevin Harper
Plaintiff Counsel: Anthony H. Handal of Handal & Morofsky
Defendant: Iconfactory, Inc.
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Victor Marrero
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/13/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Iconfactory, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 925684)Document filed by Kevin Harper.(ama) (Entered: 01/14/2011)
1/13/2011 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (ama) (Entered: 01/14/2011)
1/13/2011 Case Designated ECF. (ama) (Entered: 01/14/2011)
1/13/2011 Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV is so designated. (ama) (Entered: 01/14/2011)
1/13/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Iconfactory, Inc. (ama) (Entered: 01/14/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate