Robert Hall v. Malcolm McCormick et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-R12-5296M
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-05296-HB
File Date: Monday, July 09, 2012
Plaintiff: Robert Hall
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian S. Levenson of Schwartz & Ponterio PLLC
Defendant: Malcolm McCormick
Rostrum Records LLC
Datpiff LLC
Cause: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Harold Baer
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/9/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Datpiff LLC, Malcolm McCormick, Rostrum Records LLC. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401043027)Document filed by Robert Hall.(cd) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
7/9/2012 Case Designated ECF. (cd) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
7/9/2012 Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (cd) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
7/9/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Datpiff LLC, Malcolm McCormick, Rostrum Records LLC. (cd) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate