Sweet Wishes Stationery, LLC v. Rosanne Beck
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-S12-394R
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-00394-CWR-FKB
File Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2012
Plaintiff: Sweet Wishes Stationery, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Cable Matthew Frost, Jeremy Matthew Clay of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
Defendant: Rosanne Beck
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Judge: District Judge Carlton W. Reeves
Referred To: Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/6/2012 2 NOTICE REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION OR APPEAL REGARDING A COPYRIGHT mailed to Register of Copyrights, Copyrights Office, Library of Congress, Washington, DC 200559 AO-121 in re 1 Complaint. (ND) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
6/6/2012 1 COMPLAINT against Rosanne Beck ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 34643016187), filed by Sweet Wishes Stationery, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1 thru 24 - Copyrighted Work, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate