Georgetown Home & Garden, LLC v. Tractor Supply Company
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-G11-12006T
Court Case Number: 2:11-cv-12006-SFC-RSW
File Date: Friday, May 06, 2011
Plaintiff: Georgetown Home & Garden, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: John R. Benefiel - Attorney at Law
Defendant: Tractor Supply Company
Cause: 17:504 Copyright Infringement
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Judge: District Judge Sean F. Cox
Referred To: Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/6/2011 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Tractor Supply Company*. (CGre) (Entered: 05/06/2011)
5/6/2011 1 COMPLAINT filed by Georgetown Home & Garden, LLC against Tractor Supply Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-2968517 - Fee: $ 350. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Benefiel, John) (Entered: 05/06/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate